
Trevor Milton booked for 4 years in prison in EV truck fraud case
Ex-Nikola CEO Sentenced to 4 Years for Lying About Emissions Trucks
Trevor Milton, the founder of Nikola Corp., faces four years in prison after a jury convicted him of exaggerating claims about his company's electric and hydrogen-powered trucks, causing millions in investor losses. The judge rejected Milton's tearful plea for leniency, calling his actions "egregious" and "harmful to many."
Key Highlights:
- 4-Year Sentence for Fraud: Judge Edgardo Ramos found Milton guilty of misleading investors through social media and media outlets, causing significant financial losses.
- Rambling Plea & No Apology: Despite emotional appeals, Milton failed to apologize directly to investors and instead focused on his "heroic" intentions for clean energy.
- Judge Finds Harm to Investors: Judge Ramos noted the extensive financial damage caused by Milton's false claims, highlighting the gravity of his actions.
Detailed News:
Milton received his sentence after months of controversy surrounding Nikola's claims of developing zero-emission trucks. A 2020 HindenburgResearch report exposed the alleged "ocean of lies" behind the company's image, revealing staged demos and false claims about its technology. This led to Milton's resignation and subsequent criminal charges.
During Monday's hearing, Milton delivered a rambling statement portraying himself as a visionary champion for clean energy. He blamed his wife's illness for his resignation and avoided direct apologies to investors. The judge, however, dismissed these claims, emphasizing the substantial damage caused by Milton's “material falsehoods.” Prosecutors argued for a significant prison sentence, highlighting the widespread harm caused by Milton's fraudulent claims. Defense attorneys countered by pleading for no prison time, citing Milton's financial difficulties and future job prospects. Ultimately, the judge sided with the prosecution, emphasizing the need for accountability and deterrence.

Leaving court, Milton remained defiant, expressing confidence in an appeal of his conviction. However, the judge's stern message and four-year sentence send a clear message about the consequences of deceiving investors and jeopardizing public trust in the market.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of corporate transparency and the consequences of misleading investors. While Milton maintains his innocence, the court's ruling underscores the responsibility executives hold in providing accurate information and operating with ethical conduct.