Nowadays, most students rely on quick assistance, such as Google or ChatGPT, to get answers in a hurry. It is referred to as the culture of fast help. It is developing in schools and universities. 

Students prefer “help with online class “because it saves time and enables them to complete work earlier. However, it also causes some issues. It can prevent critical thinking and actual learning. Meanwhile, it helps students learn differently. This paragraph will discuss how quickly help assists and damages learning.

What Is 'Fast Help' and How Did It Emerge?

The concept of Quick Help began when the Internet became common. Students now search Google, utilise YouTube, or request the help of AI tools to receive assistance instantly. Previously, students used to read books or request the assistance of teachers. Currently, most students need answers quickly. This gives rise to the fact that life is not always free. Technology has also made it simple. Hence, Quick help has become a major aspect of student learning in school and college.

The Emergence of Instant Solutions From Google to ChatGPT

Now, students rely on Google and ChatGPT to get their answers in a hurry. They are convenient and quick. They input a question and receive an answer within seconds. It saves time, particularly when students are busy or have pending homework. 

Previously, students would spend hours searching for answers in books. Now, they are assisted in just a few clicks. These quick services, such as “Do my online PhD class for me” are popular, but at the same time, they transform students' learning and thinking processes.

Why Students Are Opting for Fast Answers Rather Than Thorough Learning?

Most students today opt for quick answers rather than in-depth learning. They desire to complete the work as fast as possible and proceed. School is difficult, and students can be exhausted or overwhelmed. Quick assistance seems simpler. They borrow answers without actually knowing them. In-depth learning involves effort and time. But quick assistance provides them with what they require immediately. This makes learning quite easy. Students might pass their exams, but they forget the lessons afterwards.

The Double-Edged Sword: Undermining and Reinventing Learning

Advances in technology over the last few decades are transforming the world, pervading nearly all sectors of society, including education, and many aspects of life. (Chen, 2023). Fast help can be good and bad. It helps students learn quickly, but this is not always true. They will not think as deeply anymore. But it can also enhance new, smart learning, too.

Shortcut Learning Is The End of Critical Thinking

When students rely on fast help too much, they often cannot think as deeply anymore. They want shortcuts and do not care to ask "why" or "how." That damages their critical thinking abilities. It is the ability to question, seek good answers, and solve problems. 

With shortcut learning, students simply copy and paste. They do not learn to think on their own. That is bad for them in the future, because work and life require good thinking skills, not simply quick answers from a phone or computer.

Is Dependence on External Help a New Form of Academic Laziness?

The educational landscape is currently experiencing a profound shift, with technology at the forefront of this revolution. (dissertation, 2023)Some students rely too heavily on online assistance. They use it for all their questions, even simple ones. 

They give up attempting to solve things on their own. This can be a bad habit. When students don't attempt to try, they get lazy. They wait for quick assistance rather than learning. This weakens their minds. If they don't learn at this time, they might experience huge problems later in school or at work.

Time-Saving Tools or Learning Crutches?

Fast tools save time, but are they truly useful? Some say they are great tools. Others state that they are crutches. A crutch assists one in walking, but too much use weakens the legs. Similarly, students do not learn if they continuously use fast tools. They receive answers, but no skills. Tools such as calculators or ChatGPT are supposed to assist, not to think. Students must use these resources intelligently and cautiously.

Redefining the Teacher's Role in a Fast-Help Era

Teachers no longer hold a monopoly on providing answers. Students can now look up answers online. This alters the teacher's work. Teachers now have to instruct students how to think, not what to think. They teach how to frame decent questions and verify whether answers are true. In this instant-help era, teachers act as coaches. They instruct students to utilise instant tools correctly and ensure that learning is still genuine.

Chances for Personalised, Adaptive Learning

Quick tools can also make learning more effective. Some websites and applications provide students with personalised assistance. It implies that they teach according to each student. Suppose a student learns mathematics slowly but reads quickly. The application can change according to this. This is known as adaptive learning. It assists students in learning their own way and pace. These resources are intelligent and useful if utilised properly. They assist students and make learning simpler and enjoyable.

Fast Help as a Stepping Stone to Deeper Understanding

Fast help isn't always evil. It can be a stepping stone to in-depth learning. Fast answers may be used by students to acquire basic concepts. They can then learn more and comprehend better. For instance, if a student is not familiar with a word, he or she may look it up quickly. Quick help is appropriate if students utilise it to start learning, and not to finish. It must be utilised as a tool, not the entire process.

Conclusion:

Fast help is revolutionising the process of students' learning. It can save time and provide instant answers, but it can also put an end to deep thinking. Students can forget how to solve things by themselves. Yet if it is used properly, quick help can help learning and improve both. It has to be a tool, not the complete solution. Both students and teachers have to cooperate to use quick help properly. Thus, learning can remain smart and strong.