You can also call class_foo using the class. In fact, if you define something to be a classmethod, it is probably because you intend to call it from the class rather than from a class instance. A.foo(1) would have raised a TypeError, but A.class_foo(1) works just fine:
One use people have found for class methods is to create inheritable alternative constructors.
With staticmethods, neither self (the object instance) nor cls (the class) is implicitly passed as the first argument. They behave like plain functions except that you can call them from an instance or the class:
Staticmethods are used to group functions which have some logical connection with a class to the class.
foo is just a function, but when you call a.foo you don't just get the function, you get a "partially applied" version of the function with the object instance a bound as the first argument to the function. foo expects 2 arguments, while a.foo only expects 1 argument.
a is bound to foo. That is what is meant by the term "bound" below:
print(a.foo) # <bound method A.foo of <__main__.A object at 0xb7d52f0c>>
With a.class_foo, a is not bound to class_foo, rather the class A is bound to class_foo.
print(a.class_foo) # <bound method type.class_foo of <class '__main__.A'>>
Here, with a staticmethod, even though it is a method, a.static_foo just returns a good 'ole function with no arguments bound. static_foo expects 1 argument, and a.static_foo expects 1 argument too.
print(a.static_foo) # <function static_foo at 0xb7d479cc>
Join MindStick Community
You need to log in or register to vote on answers or questions.
We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. By using our site, you
acknowledge that you have read and understood our
Cookie Policy &
Privacy Policy.
Can you answer this question?
Write Answer1 Answers