When I ask Grok to summarize a long X discussion, I sometimes want to know what the person who started the conversation actually claimed, rather than a blended summary of everyone’s replies and quote posts.
Does it reliably keep the original post versus reposts distinct, including when people quote the post to disagree with it? If you’ve tried this on a busy thread, what wording helped you get a useful account of who said what?
Can you answer this question?
Write Answer0 Answers