Some X discussions are hard to follow because replies quote earlier posts, branch into side conversations, or show up in a search feed out of sequence. Can Grok reconstruct the main thread accurately when the posts are presented as out-of-order replies?

I’m interested in whether it can distinguish the original argument from later reactions, rather than simply summarizing whichever posts it sees first. If you’ve tried this with a long thread, how well did it preserve the sequence and context?