I’ve been using Perplexity to research technical questions where reputable sources sometimes reach different conclusions. The citations are useful, but I’m not always sure whether the answer is weighing the evidence or simply presenting whichever explanation is easier to summarize.
When sources disagree on a technical claim, how do you get a useful comparison rather than a blended answer? I’d like to hear what prompts or follow-up questions help surface conflicting source claims and the reasons behind the disagreement.
Can you answer this question?
Write Answer0 Answers