--- title: "Elon Musk's Ban on Work From Home Work at X, Court Dismissed a Lawsuit" description: "Dismissal of the lawsuit filed on X for biased decision against the disability of the employee of the social media platform onwned by Elon Musk" author: "Sanjay Goenka" published: 2024-08-22 updated: 2024-08-22 canonical: https://www.mindstick.com/news/3976/elon-musk-s-ban-on-work-from-home-work-at-x-court-dismissed-a-lawsuit category: "twitter" tags: ["twitter", "social media platform"] reading_time: 2 minutes --- # Elon Musk's Ban on Work From Home Work at X, Court Dismissed a Lawsuit Platform X and its owner [Elon Musk](https://yourviews.mindstick.com/story/2260/let-s-explore-the-personal-life-of-elon-musk-with-interesting-facts) dealt in a case law in which a federal judge in California dismissed a lawsuit involving the accusation on the social [media platform](https://www.mindstick.com/forum/156104/what-are-the-social-media-platform-used-for-seo) for forcing out workers from the company which decided to bar [employees](https://www.mindstick.com/articles/44463/business-to-business-vat-reclaiming-a-guide-for-your-employees) from working remotely. Elon Musk, Globally [known as](https://answers.mindstick.com/qa/35703/ricky-ponting-is-also-known-as-what) the [tech](https://www.mindstick.com/services/technologies) pioneer in the present world stated that employees should work "long hours at high intensity" or quit, further adding more into it he said that working from home is "morally wrong". ## Highlights 1. Musk urges employees to work “long hours at high intensity” 2. The lawsuit contains a violation of the law related to employee disability 3. Elon Musk acquired X earlier called Twiter at $44 billion. The case came to light when an employee of X Dmitry Borodaenko filed a suit against the company for forcing him out of the company besides having the disability and allowing him to [remote work](https://www.mindstick.com/blog/297351/how-to-effectively-utilise-remote-working-as-a-growing-business) facility. The *US Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin* recently offered four more weeks to file an amended lawsuit including more detailed claims. The matter of Musk and its company X earlier called Twitter with its employee Borodaenko, a former engineer manager and cancer survivor was fired shortly after Elon Musk acquired X and conducted a meeting during the [Covid-19 pandemic](https://answers.mindstick.com/qa/101201/how-did-the-world-respond-to-the-covid-19-pandemic) all were called for a meeting and this engineer refused to come. The lawsuit against X includes the violations of the law requiring employees to accommodate workers' [disabilities](https://answers.mindstick.com/qa/32810/what-is-the-americans-with-disabilities-act-ada). “Borodaenko’s theory improperly relies on the assumption that all employees with disabilities necessarily required remote work as a reasonable [accommodation](https://yourviews.mindstick.com/audio/1168/supported-disability-accommodation-what-is-it),” The employee wrote in a letter. Twitter is a globally known [social media](https://www.mindstick.com/articles/13056/how-to-leverage-social-media-to-attract-lots-of-blog-traffic) platform that people from all over the world use to express their agendas, opinions, and information freely. --- Original Source: https://www.mindstick.com/news/3976/elon-musk-s-ban-on-work-from-home-work-at-x-court-dismissed-a-lawsuit Copyright © MindStick Software Pvt. Ltd. This Markdown version is provided for developers, AI systems, and offline reading.